El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.
Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.
English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.
Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.Collapse ▲
Herbicide resistance refers to the inherited ability of a biotype of a weed to survive a herbicide application to which the original population was susceptible. A biotype is a group of plants within a species that has biological traits (such as resistance to a particular herbicide) not common to the population as a whole.
Herbicide resistance is potentially a very serious problem facing North Carolina growers. Worldwide, over 100 biotypes of weeds are known to be resistant to one or more commonly used herbicides. In North Carolina, we currently have a biotype of goosegrass resistant to dinitroaniline herbicides (Prowl, Sonalan, and Treflan), a biotype of cocklebur resistant to MSMA and DSMA, and a biotype of annual ryegrass resistant to Hoelon.
Until recently, there was little concern about the development of herbicide resistance in North Carolina. Although we have three species with biotypes resistant to certain herbicides, the occurrence of these biotypes was easily explained by growing crops in a monoculture. Growers who were rotating crops had little need to worry about resistance. The situation, however, has changed in recent years because of the development and widespread use of several herbicides having the same mechanism of action (Tables 15 and 16). Mechanism of action refers to the specific process through which a herbicide kills a susceptible plant. Today, herbicides having the same mechanism of action can be used on several crops that may be grown in rotation. Of particular concern are those herbicides that inhibit the ALS enzyme system (Table 15). Several of our most commonly used herbicides are ALS inhibitors. In addition, many of the new herbicides expected to be registered within the next 5 years are ALS inhibitors. As a group, ALS inhibitors have a number of characteristics that seem to make them prone to the development of plant resistance.
Herbicides are used in crop production simply because they are more effective or more economical than other means of weed control. If resistance to a particular herbicide or family of herbicides evolves, suitable alternative herbicides may not exist. For example, there is currently no alternative herbicide to control Hoelon-resistant ryegrass. Hence, herbicides should be viewed as resources to be protected. We must use herbicides in a manner that deters the development of resistance.
An understanding of how resistance evolves is essential to understanding how to avoid resistance. There are two prerequisites for herbicide resistance evolution. First, individual weeds possessing genes conferring resistance must be present in the native population. Second, selection pressure resulting from extensive use of a herbicide to which these rare individuals are resistant must be exerted on the population. Resistant individuals, if present, make up a very low percentage of the overall population. Typically, resistant individuals are present at frequencies ranging from 1 in 100,000 to 1 in 100 million. If the same herbicide or herbicides with the same mechanism of action are used continuously, the susceptible individuals are killed but the resistant individuals are unharmed and produce seed. If the selection pressure continues for several generations, the resistant biotype will ultimately make up a high percentage of the population. At that point, acceptable weed control can no longer be obtained with the particular herbicide or herbicides.
The single most important component of a management strategy to avoid evolution of herbicide resistance is the rotation of herbicides having different mechanisms of action (Tables 15 and 16). Do not apply herbicides in the high-risk category in Table 15 to two consecutive crops. Likewise, do not make more than two applications of these high-risk herbicides to the same crop. Do not apply herbicides in the moderate-risk category to more than two consecutive crops. Herbicides in the low-risk category should be chosen when they will control the complex of weeds present.
Tank mixes or sequential applications of herbicides having different mechanisms of action are often touted as components of a resistance management strategy. If the components of the tank mix or sequential applications are chosen wisely, this strategy can be very helpful in delaying resistance evolution. Unfortunately, many of the requirements of tank mix or sequential applications to avoid resistance are not met with commonly used mixtures. To be most effective at preventing resistance evolution, both herbicides used sequentially or in tank mixtures should have the same spectrum of control and should have similar persistence.
To the extent possible, integrate nonchemical control practices such as cultivation into weed management program. Maintain good records of herbicide usage in each field for future reference.
Detecting herbicide-resistant weeds. The vast majority of weed control failures are not due to herbicide resistance. Before assuming that weeds surviving a herbicide application are resistant, eliminate all other possible causes of poor control. Potential causes of a weed control failure include things such as misapplication (such as inadequate rate, poor coverage, poor incorporation, or lack of an adjuvant); unfavorable weather conditions for good herbicide activity; improper timing of herbicide application (in particular, applying postemergence herbicides after weeds are too large for good control); and weeds emerging after application of a short-residual herbicide.
Once all other possible causes of poor control have been eliminated, the following may indicate presence of a herbicide-resistant biotype: (1) all species normally controlled by the herbicide except one are controlled well; (2) healthy plants of the species in question are interspersed among plants of the same species that were killed; (3) the species not controlled is normally very susceptible to the herbicide in question; and (4) the field has a history of extensive use of the herbicide in question or herbicides with the same mechanism of action.
If resistance is suspected, immediately stop using the herbicide in question and other herbicides having the same mechanism of action. Contact your county Extension Service agent and a representative of the chemical company for advice on alternative control strategies. Follow an intensive program that relies upon herbicides with a different mechanism of action and nonchemical control practices to reduce weed seed production as much as possible. Avoid spreading weed seed to other fields. Plan your weed management program for subsequent crops carefully.