Save Money and Slow Resistance by Skipping Insecticidal Seed Treatments in Soybean

— Written By
en Español / em Português

El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.

Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.


Inglês é o idioma de controle desta página. Na medida que haja algum conflito entre o texto original em Inglês e a tradução, o Inglês prevalece.

Ao clicar no link de tradução, um serviço gratuito de tradução será ativado para converter a página para o Português. Como em qualquer tradução pela internet, a conversão não é sensivel ao contexto e pode não ocorrer a tradução para o significado orginal. O serviço de Extensão da Carolina do Norte (NC State Extension) não garante a exatidão do texto traduzido. Por favor, observe que algumas funções ou serviços podem não funcionar como esperado após a tradução.


English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.

Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.

Collapse ▲

Note this article only applies to insecticides, not fungicides or nematicides.

The evidence is overwhelming. Neonicotinoid insecticide seed treatments do not provide a benefit in North Carolina. Most recently our data were used in a study across 12 years and 14 states. We concluded that there was no “support for continuing the current approach of blanket NST [neonicotinoid insecticide seed treatment] use in soybeans. On the contrary, our data suggest that this approach provides little to zero net benefit in most cases” (Mourtzinis et al. 2019). This lines up with data taken across North Carolina and Virginia. Out of 26 tests, we have never measured a yield advantage to using insecticide seed treatments. The following paragraphs explain a) why this is the case and b) mention the huge unintended drawbacks to using an insecticidal seed treatment in soybeans.

A) The reasons we don’t see a yield response to soybean insecticidal seed treatments in North Carolina

Hesler et al. (2018) mention nine major pest species across the US targeted by soybean insecticidal seed treatments. All of these pests are sporadic and don’t occur in every field all the time. Of the pests mentioned in this study, bean leaf beetle, leafhoppers, three-cornered alfalfa hopper, thrips, white grubs, and wireworms are the most commonly found in North Carolina. Here are some considerations with each of these pests:

1) Bean leaf beetle- we generally have around three generations a year in North Carolina. They can be severe defoliators late in the season and contribute to the defoliator complex. However, I have yet to see a single field in the state that caused enough early season defoliation to cause yield loss. Their numbers are just too low at this point in the season. Furthermore, while they transmit virus in the Midwest, this is very rare in North Carolina. This is not a pest we need to worry about in early-season soybeans.

2) Leafhoppers, especially potato leafhopper, are frequently found in soybean fields, but do no commonly occur at levels that are a problem. In high numbers, they can “hopper burn”, but this is extremely rare. For the last six years, with the exception of 2017, we have gotten reports of soybean fields with yellow, curling leaves. A lot of people think it’s hopper burn, but it’s not . It’s been noted it in multiple states and mostly in Group VI and VII soybeans. Nobody can figure out what it is, but my gut feeling is it’s an environmental-germplasm interaction. This is not a pest we need to worry about in early-season soybeans.

3) Three-cornered alfalfa hopper IS a pest we need to worry about early-season. They feed on the main stem and girdle it during the seedling stage. This early-season girdling can lead to lodging later in the season. This does not always translate into a yield loss; for example, neighboring plants may compensate or, if the lodging takes place close to harvest, lodged plants may be held up by their neighbors. However, they can occasionally cause yield loss ranging anywhere from mild to severe. Once plants reach 10-12 inches in height, three-cornered alfalfa hoppers begin to feed on branch petioles and are not a problem. While seed treatments will have some efficacy on these pests, because they are so sporadic, a more cost-effective strategy is to walk fields to see if they are present when plants are small. Put a sweep net in fields with sizeable numbers and treat if levels reach one per sweep (one swoosh of the net).

4)  Thrips are probably present in every soybean field in North Carolina. We published a study during 2012 that showed insecticidal seed treatments killed thrips, but didn’t impact yield. Some of the same thrips species feed on both cotton and soybeans, and insecticidal seed treatments have a clear positive value in cotton. Unfortunately, new evidence has emerged that overuse of insecticidal seed treatments in soybeans has driven resistance for thrips to insecticidal seed treatments in both cotton and soybean (Huseth et al. 2018). Not only are thrips an insect we do not need to control in soybeans, doing so will harm us in other crops, like cotton, where they do need controlled.

5) White grubs and wireworms are very sporadic pests and, frankly, difficult to find in sizeable numbers these days. While I have conducted many experiments with corn showing that insecticidal seed treatments do a good job at controlling these pests and protecting yield (a few examples, Efficacy of Insecticidal Seed Treatments for Annual White Grub, 2016, Efficacy of a New Insecticidal Seed Treatment, Cyantraniliprole for Annual White Grub, 2016, and Efficacy of a New Insecticidal Seed Treatment, Cyantraniliprole for Annual White Grub, 2016), I’ve had many other soybean seed treatment tests right beside them in the same field. I’ve never seen soybeans damaged in North Carolina by white grubs and wireworms to a level that affected yield. These are not pests that we need to control in early-season soybeans.

B) The reasons we can have huge unintended drawbacks to using an insecticidal seed treatment in soybeans

First, as mentioned previously, the use of neonicotinoid insecticidal seed treatments has already driven resistance in one pest (tobacco thrips). If we use them in corn, cotton, and soybeans, resistance will occur sooner rather than later for other pests, as well. Secondly, insecticidal seed treatments kill beneficial insects as well as pests. For example, they can kill predatory ground beetles, releasing slugs that clip plants and reduce yields (Douglas et al. 2015). We don’t have any remedial management methods to kill slugs and I have witnessed severe damage from them many times (see photo). Finally, using insecticidal seed treatments in soybeans unnecessarily exposes the environment to negative impacts, such as degraded surface and groundwater quality and can negatively impact pollinators.

Image of field

Field decimated by slugs (foreground); good stand in the background.